Saturday, 13 February 2010

CLIMATEGATE

HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO TELL THE TRUTH FROM THE BOLLOCKS WHEN IT COMES FROM THE IPCC CLIMATE CHANGE PANEL???

Oh deary me, those pesky scientists have been caught doing naughty things yet again, what is wrong with them? they are always trying to find ways to topple the earth for their own ends by whatever means possible, now this time DR Madmanstein and his cadre of esteemed, maniacal white coated professers have taken over the enviorement protest issue, specifically the global warming 'scene'.
The IPCC (the group in charge of global warming) calls to the world that "the debate is over" concerning global warming, it's causes and the solutions are not resting on such firm foundations as it once seemed to be doing in the wake of all the leaked emails from the international panel in charge of  monitoring global warming that detail how the panel has been telling us untruth after untruth. It has become hard to believe anything that comes out of their collective press release.
The panel's claims of melting ice caps, dieing, stranded Polar bears, and the end of skiing on icy mountains in the northern hemisphere are sounding like the prostentations of just another huckster charity who make wild speculations and claims in order to squeeze any amount of money out of us in any way they can, their claims of melting ice caps have been shown to be nothing more than seasonal melting, the Polar bears 'stranded' on a shrinking ice block were actually found to be floating just meters from firm ground (Polar bears can also swim anything up to 100 miles if they have to) and the panels members have been caught making up claims about our impending doom from the top of their heads while hiding scientific data that contradicted them, no matter how important. It could also mean that correct, important, even life saving data released by the IPCC is ignored or disgarded out of hand because they might not be believed (who believes or gives serious time to a known liar??).
I for one always had questions about the whole issue, it's not that I don't believe the world is warming up because I do (according to NASA, other planets in our solar system are also experiencing climate warming), it's why and how that I question (-and no I don't have all the answers).
It's those pesky little nagging things like the 400-odd year long 'Maunder minnimum' or the 'little ice age' as it's other wise known, that happened during the middle ages, enabling people to hold ice fairs on the four foot thick ice of the frozen Thames. Or situations like the Romans growing wine grapes around the vicinity of Hadrians wall (imagine tyneside wine??!), or the known historical temprature variations recorded throughout the centuries etc.).
The whole global warming issue just appeared out of nowhere fully formed and with it's own catastrophic deadlines, 100% definite causes and a complete cause, and with it reason and fault that is unshakable and unwilling to compensate any new findings if they do not fit to the rigid dogmatic template 100%, like some planned out religion with a rigid and zealous zeal, ignoring newly discovered sacred writings that may shed light on the movements 'truth' information which could possibility upset the status and comfort of it's preists.
What (else) made me question the whole issue was finding out that in the U.S. alone (a country supposedly sceptical to the issue) there had been over one thousand new 'global warming' taxes introduced, while at the same time not actually seriously doing anything new to combat global warming. That, and the way politicians use the threat of global warming as a stick to beat us with (and a halo for them to wear) yet despite meeting after meeting all they have agreed on is a way to pass the pollution around to the countries with the most money, effectivley using pollution as a bargining tool for those in big petro and chemical companies and such like while leveeing large fines on the poorer countries who cannot afford the carbon caps, and so end up on the wrong end of fines for pollution, a truely one sided affair that smacks of old time colonial methods.
Like I said above, I don't doubt that we are experiencing weather changes, what I doubt is the IPCC and the way they have conducted business, the way they work has led them open to critisism, the method of just popping out of nowhere and in to the public arena brandishing a cast iron set of results that they said were infallible also led to suspicion, and the way that they have stifled the many and any scientists or critics, famous and peer respected both, who disagreed with their findings was obviously also going to create big time suspision, as were using photographs and quotes for public comsumption, taken from other sources that were used wildly out of context.
All that added to the extravangent lifestyles led by some of those high up in the climate change lobby don't help either, for example there is the board member (and sometime public face of the campaign) who demands that a big car come every day to drive him the two minute distance from his residence to his office, despite them being within spitting distance of eachother. And I needn't mention the many emails detailing the (often succsseful) attempts to deceive the public with false, doctored and suppressed data over a long period of time.
The IPCC has treated the public as fools, and their arrogance is going to come back and haunt them for quite a while. They need to be open and honest and this is the time. Otherwise the IPCC will forever look just like another waste of money rouge department or quango who release fake information just so that they can carry on living in nice homes while enjoying large research grants given  them to investigate the false science they propogate.

No comments:

Blog Archive